Essay regarding the Death of Günter Grass
and the Double Standards of the Elites
Appended Grass‘s poem
from 2012: „What Must Be Said“ 
written by Jahn J Kassl
translated by Franz
_______________________________________________
On April 13th, 2015 one of the most significant
German language writers of current history,
Günter Wilhelm Grass (*16.10.1927), returned to
his creator. For this occasion his poem from the year
2012 “What must be said” is included at the end in
its entirety.
Double Standard of the Elites 
As Grass publicly announced his participation in the 
Waffen-SS in August 2006, politicians and media jumped 
on him. The double
standard of our politicians and the 
media had high season and that Grass had
reported his
SS-membership to the US army during his imprisonment 
on May 8th,
1945, no longer had any weight.
Joachim Fest, conservative
German journalist, historian
and biographer of Adolf Hitler, said to the German weekly
Der Spiegel about Grass's disclosure: “After 60 years,
this confession comes a bit too late. I can't understand
how someone who for decades set himself up as a moral
authority, a rather smug one, could pull this off.”
and biographer of Adolf Hitler, said to the German weekly
Der Spiegel about Grass's disclosure: “After 60 years,
this confession comes a bit too late. I can't understand
how someone who for decades set himself up as a moral
authority, a rather smug one, could pull this off.”
(…)
… Grass's
biographer Michael Jürgs described the 
controversy as resulting in "the
end of a moral institution".[61] 
Lech
Walesa initially criticized Grass for keeping silent about 
his SS membership for
60 years. He later withdrew his criticism 
after reading Grass's letter to the
mayor of Gdansk, saying 
that Grass "set the good example for the others."[62] On 14
August
2006, the ruling party of Poland, Law and Order, called on Grass 
to
relinquish his honorary citizenship of Gdansk. Jacek Kurski, 
a Law and Justice politician said, "It is unacceptable for a city 
where the first blood was
shed, where World War II began, to 
have a Waffen-SS member as an honorary
citizen."[63] But, 
according to a 2010 poll[64][65] ordered
by city's authorities, 
the vast majority of Gdańsk citizens did not support
Kurski's 
position. The mayor of Gdańsk, Pawel Adamowicz, said that
he opposed
submitting the affair to the municipal council 
because it was not for the council to judge history.[66]  
(Source: Wikipedia) 
The
CDU-Politicians Wolfgang Börnsen and Philipp Mißfelder 
asked him for the return
of the Nobel Prize. 
(…) Max A. Höfer, Executive of “Initiative Neue Soziale 
Marktwirtschaft”, cited in the spring of 2007 in “Neue Zürcher 
Zeitung”, the „penetrating moral rigors“ of Grass are
an „act 
of substitution“, „which polemics
probably never exclusively 
and only point to the fact, which is much more
nurtured by 
the essence of concealed shame and guilt, and hoped  
“that nobody would no longer let themselves
be taken
to task” by Grass. 
The Nazi-Club was swung, certainly politically
correct. 
The “good ones”, those, who stood on the correct side
of the 
system and exercised the sovereignty of interpretation, 
got worked up
about Grass’s long silence regarding his Nazi past. 
And just as loud as the outcry was about Grass, just as 
silent is it
today, when it deals with the war of the new 
Nazis, the Kiev Junta, against
their own people. 
The wall of silence regarding the events
in Donbass 
are nearly as impervious, and our representatives 
collaborate with
the Putsch-regime in Kiev, which 
is infiltrated by Bandera fascists. 
What for Hitler were the Jews, the
Gypsies and the Slavic 
races in general, are for the Kiev rulers, from
Poroshenko 
and Yatsenyuk down, the Russians and anything Russian. 
The gas
princess and multi billionaire Julia Timoshenko, 
who obtained her unbelievable
wealth due to theft from 
her own people, would like to singlehandedly shoot a 
bullet into Putin’s head (“I am willing
to take up a 
weapon and shoot the bastard (Putin) in his head” 2014).
From the West regarding this? Until
today silence! 
Instead there is military assistance
from the USA and NATO 
for the Kiev fascists, so that the genocide against their
own 
people can be continued and can provoke a great war against 
Russia. The
saber rattle at Russia’s borders completes the 
picture and lets one conclude
this without misunderstanding.
Politicians collaborate with Nazis 
What Grass has been accused of, namely the SS membership 
of a 17-year old, today is political and media mainstream: 
It is the yearlong cooperation of our politicians with the 
corporate
elites, the Neoconservatives in Washington
and recently the support of the Nazi
and Bandera fascists 
in Kiev.  
With the small difference, that our elites are no
longer 17, 
and carry a different responsibility. Grass had to endure
ridicule, while Obama, Merkel, Tusk, Mogherini, Schulz, 
Juncker, Schäuble, Hollande, and whatever their name is, 
collaborate
quite obviously with the Kiev Nazis or the NWO 
conspirators in the White House
and thereby give silent 
agreement to the Bandera brigades for the genocide in 
the Ukraine.
It is murder against the people, which only in its extent 
still does not
reach the number of victims of the SS crimes, 
yet in its manner is not inferior
in anything compared to the 
Hitler Nazis.The situation in the Ukraine corresponds
»100 
percent to the classical definition of Dimitrov, fascism in its 
classical and purest form«. (Stephen Lendman, 12/17/2014) 
Double standards, which are absolutely sickening! 
Against which a 17 year-old was then supposed to fight 
against, something
our elites do not even recognize today: 
fascism and its resurrection! Therefore our politicians belong, 
according to “paragraph of promotion
of Nazi ideology”, in 
front of an International Military Tribunal and not in a 
government chair! 
As a result of the
enormous suffering inflicted upon the world 
by the Nazi regime, and especially
Europe, a number of European 
countries have enacted laws criminalizing both the
denial of the 
Holocaust and the promotion of Nazi ideology. 
The aim of these laws
is to prevent the resurrection of Nazism 
in Europe by stamping out at the
earliest opportunity – or to 
use the phrase “to nip it in the bud” – any public
reemergence 
of Nazi views, whether through speech, symbols, or public 
association. 
Individuals and groups
today promoting Nazism, often called 
neo-Nazis, do not limit their ideology
just to anti Semitism. 
Part and parcel of their message also involves hatred of
other 
minority groups, most often individuals of African, Arab and 
Asian
descent, and immigrants from non-European nations. 
As a result, a number
of the European laws banning neo-Nazi 
messages also ban racist and hate speech.
Some also criminalize 
the denial of other genocides, most prominently the
genocide 
of the Armenians. 
Some of these
countries, like Germany and Austria, take these 
laws very seriously and
vigilantly prosecute both speech and 
behavior having any reference to Nazis and
Nazism. Others, 
like Lithuania and Romania, despite laws on the books, 
enforce
them sporadically. 
A last set of
countries put a higher value on free speech over 
the suppression of neo-Nazism
and freely allow promotion of 
the Nazi message. In these countries, freedom of
the press 
and freedom of speech are vehemently upheld even to the 
detriment of
other rights. These countries include the 
United Kingdom, Ireland and the
Scandinavian nations. 
The anti-Nazi laws do
not exist in every European country. 
Presently, the following European
countries have some legislation 
criminalizing the Nazi message, including denial of the Holocaust:
criminalizing the Nazi message, including denial of the Holocaust:
Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, 
Liechtenstein, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, 
Slovakia, Spain and
Switzerland. Holocaust denial is also 
illegal in Israel. 
(Holocaust Denial Laws and Other Legislation
Criminalizing 
Promotion of Nazism, Prof. Michael J. Bazyler, Oppenheim 
Research
Fellow International Institute for Holocaust Studies, 
Yad Vashem Professor of
Law, Whittier Law School, California, 
USA)
Here I see the facts of the case clearly
fulfilled, because our 
political actors are in constant connection with the
commander-
in-chief of the Ukrainian army, the illegitimate President of the 
Ukraine Petro Poroshenko, as well as the illegitimate President 
Yatsenyuk.
And this while the murder continues in
the East of the country!
And Israel? 
Also here is the double standard, which
our elites have 
succumbed to, the master of all lies.
While Israel manages the greatest free
air concentration 
camp on earth (The 40 kilometers long and 10 kilometers 
wide
Gaza strip is surrounded by a 60 kilometer long wall, 
which was erected in the
1990’s. 1.7 million people are thereby 
nearly completely controlled by the
Israeli army. 
The Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and 
Emergency Relief Coordinator John Holmes, spoke in this 
connection of a “huge free-air prison
without normality 
and without human dignity. (diepresse.com, 11/18/2012)
and writes a
deep-black chapter in human history by burning 
and mass murder, everyone, who
criticizes this policy, is 
branded with the accusation of anti Semitism.
Besides the 
expression of “conspiracy theorist” or “Nazi-Club”, “anti Semitism” 
is another accusation, which has been implemented by the NWO, 
in order to
silence critics.
Allegation of Nazi-Club and
Anti-Semitism
Günter Grass also experienced this, when
he published the 
poem “What Must Be Said” in the “Süddeutsche Zeitung” 
on April
4th, 2012.
“This past week (March
2nd, 2015), Israel’s prime minister, 
Benjamin Netanyahu on the invitation of US
Representative, 
John Boehner, addressed the US Congress on nuclear weapons 
and
specifically how dangerous Iran would be with these 
weapons of mass
destruction. Few would dispute that point 
while others would go even further
asserting that none of 
the countries in the Middle East should have nuclear
weapons. 
But, no one has made this bold statement more eloquently 
than
Günter Grass, the 87-year old Nobel Prize laureate, 
German writer
(novelist, poet and playwright) and artist 
(illustrator, scepter, and graphic
artist).
Grass is best known
for his novels including The Tin Drum (1959),  
Cat and Mouse (1963), Dog Years (1965), and his memoirs:  
Peeling the Onion
(2007), The
Box (2010), and Grimm’s Words: 
A
Declaration of Love (2010) but he is also known as the author 
of the
controversial poem “What Must Be Said” (2012) – which 
reveals the hypocrisy of the
German military when they decided 
to sell and deliver a submarine that could be
used to launch 
nuclear warheads against Iran.
Unfairly criticized
and declared persona non grata in Israel, 
Grass has been a life long advocate
of peace and a supporter 
of the Social Democratic Party of Germany. He has
often 
criticized Germany and went on record opposing the unification 
of
Germany, afraid the country would resume its role as a 
“belligerent” nation.
What Must Be Said are
the words of a “hesitant” German to 
call out both the German and the Israeli
government and 
the western powers for their policies and actions on nuclear 
warheads in the Middle East. The danger of selling Israel a 
submarine capable
of launching nuclear warheads into Iran 
is portrayed in the poem with the
question asked: Does 
Israel have the right to launch a nuclear warhead onto 
Iranian soil and wipe out the Iranian people because the 
country may be
developing their own nuclear warheads? 
And, why isn’t Israel subject to the
same supervision and 
inspections as Iran?  The poem points out the
hypocrisy 
of the world powers and how dangerous it is to allow nuclear 
warheads
in an area fraught with tension, aggressive behavior, 
and fragility.”
(Source: Anne
Paddock, Paddock Post, March 7th, 2015) 
Following the publication of the poem
Grass gave several 
interviews and said among others: “There are only a few 
countries, which disregard UN resolutions as does Israel. 
It has been pointed out often enough by the UN that the 
settlement
policy has to stop, but it continues.”… 
 
“Any criticism of Israel is the worst one can do to Israel.”
…”Israel is
not only a nuclear power, instead it also developed 
into an occupation power.”(Source: Spiegel online, April 5th,
2012)
„Let any
one of you who is without sin be the 
first to throw a stone at her.”  (John
8:7)
Then
in Jerusalem, human Beings dropped the stones, 
after Jesus put a mirror in
front of them, they felt caught 
bare handed, and the woman survived. Today this
is 
entirely different.
The greatest evildoers are as far from
any guilt or 
injustice consciousness as the sun is from the earth, 
and they
accuse others of the evil, which they themselves 
commit. 
Today the new Nazis and the Nazi
collaborators, 
which have advanced to the highest offices of State 
or to the
highest positions in the media, describe those, 
who stand up against the system,
generally as Nazis, 
this unquestionably under the cover of democracy.
Some
even receive the Nobel Peace Prize, like the drone bomber
and mass murderer, US
President Barack Hussein Obama.
It is obvious that mankind has a problem:
 „Civil disobedience is not our problem.
Our problem is civil 
obedience. Our problem is that people all over the world
have 
obeyed the dictates of leaders…and millions have been killed 
because of
this obedience…Our problem is that people are 
obedient allover the world in the
face of poverty and starvation 
and stupidity, and war, and cruelty. Our problem
is that people 
are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves… (and) 
the grand thieves are running the country. That’s our problem.”
Howard Zinn (1922-2010) US-American Historian, Failure
to Quit
And this problem is a challenge and a chance at the
same time, 
because it is necessary to withdraw from this system and to 
create a
new consciousness – first in oneself!
Obeying the inner Voice
Obeying yes, but
not the system, 
instead one’s inner voice!
1.) Obeying the inner voice, as one wants to 
impose a new war on us, by whatever
means.
2.) Obeying the inner voice,as one wants to kill us 
with mandatory inoculation, RFID-Chips or gene food. 
3.) Obeying the inner voice and not go there when 
there is war.
4.) Obeying the inner voice,and not purchase 
what cartels offer us.
5.) Obeying the inner voice 
and reject the RFID-Chip.
6.) Obeying the inner voice 
and bring your television to special recycling.
7.) Obeying the inner voice 
and restrict the use of the cell phone.
8.) Obeying the inner voiceand whenever possible 
avoid conventional medicine,
using medications.
9.) Obeying the inner voice 
and apply alternative healing methods (i.e.
homeopathy, 
quantum healing, consciousness work).
10.) Obeying the inner voiceand make known 
your standpoint and defend it
courageously.
11.) Obeying the inner voice and call things by their name.
12.) Obeying the
inner voiceand trust God, 
because
the inner voice reveals God to us.
Günter Grass has returned to his creator. What he leaves 
behind for us deserves respect and the necessary appreciation.
The “inner voice” was still intact with this writer,
behind for us deserves respect and the necessary appreciation.
The “inner voice” was still intact with this writer,
the look at the world – even though with bitterness – mostly 
clear and what
must be said was still said, even though with 
the “last ink”.
These are attributes, which our elites in media and
politics are 
cut off from. In these human Beings the “inner voice” has been 
silenced, it can no longer be detected and therefore they work 
themselves off
in a bold manner on personalities like 
Günter Grass. Pointing with the finger
at human weaknesses 
of others, they hide their own inhumanity and the resulting 
crimes. Today like 2000 years ago:
„Why do you look at the speck of
sawdust in your brother's 
eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own
eye?“ 
Bible, Mathew7:3
This is with respect to the life and death of this
great 
writer and based on my inner voice “What Still Must Be Said”!

Günter Grass: What must be said
Why have I kept silent, held back so long,
on something openly practised in
war games, at the end of which those of us
who survive will at best be footnotes?
It's the alleged right to a first strike
that could destroy an Iranian people
subjugated by a loudmouth
and gathered in organized rallies,
because an atom bomb may be being
developed within his arc of power.
Yet why do I hesitate to name
that other land in which
for years – although kept secret –
a growing nuclear power has existed
beyond supervision or verification,
subject to no inspection of any kind?
This general silence on the facts,
before which my own silence has bowed,
seems to me a troubling, enforced lie,
leading to a likely punishment
the moment it's broken:
the verdict "Anti-semitism" falls easily.
But now that my own country,
brought in time after time
for questioning about its own crimes,
profound and beyond compare,
has delivered yet another submarine to Israel,
(in what is purely a business transaction,
though glibly declared an act of reparation)
whose speciality consists in its ability
to direct nuclear warheads toward
an area in which not a single atom bomb
has yet been proved to exist, its feared
existence proof enough, I'll say what must be said.
But why have I kept silent till now?
Because I thought my own origins,
tarnished by a stain that can never be removed,
meant I could not expect Israel, a land
to which I am, and always will be, attached,
to accept this open declaration of the truth.
Why only now, grown old,
and with what ink remains, do I say:
Israel's atomic power endangers
an already fragile world peace?
Because what must be said
may be too late tomorrow;
and because – burdened enough as Germans –
we may be providing material for a crime
that is foreseeable, so that our complicity
will not be expunged by any
of the usual excuses.
And granted: I've broken my silence
because I'm sick of the West's hypocrisy;
and I hope too that many may be freed
from their silence, may demand
that those responsible for the open danger
we face renounce the use of force,
may insist that the governments of
both Iran and Israel allow an international authority
free and open inspection of
the nuclear potential and capability of both.
No other course offers help
to Israelis and Palestinians alike,
to all those living side by side in enmity
in this region occupied by illusions,
and ultimately, to all of us.
Günter Grass
• This poem was amended on 10 and
11 April 2012 after it 
was revised by the translator. This was further amended
on 
13 April 2012 to include a link to the original poem in German. 
_______________________________________________
The Bible Errs, The Crucifixion and Death of Jesus – JJK:
http://lichtweltverlag.blogspot.co.at/2015/04/the-bible-errs-crucifixion-and-death-of.html
The Lichtweltportal is free of advertisement and declines
_______________________________________________
The Bible Errs, The Crucifixion and Death of Jesus – JJK:
http://lichtweltverlag.blogspot.co.at/2015/04/the-bible-errs-crucifixion-and-death-of.html
The Lichtweltportal is free of advertisement and declines
any direct linking, in
order to guarantee the clarity of the 
homepage and the pure vibration of its
contributions. 
The light world publishing and the author do not lead 
any correspondence whatsoever on the texts / messages 
published on
this website.
 
 
